Monthly Archives: December 2016

Hyperannotation 3

Nielson, David R. “’Cyclops,’ Sinn Féin, and ‘The Jew’: An Historical Reconsideration.” Journal of Modern Literature 19.2 (1995): 245-57. JSTOR. Web. 29 Nov. 2016.

Related topics:

 

 

Religion

Union and Division

 

Link to citation page: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3831591?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Link to full text: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3831591.pdf

 

Nielson’s article inspects the various formulations of Irish nationalism and James Joyce’s personal experiences with both Irish republicanism and anti-Jewish European fervor in order to reinterpret the political motivations of the “Cyclops” episode and reassess its historical origins. Nielson claims that the scholarship regarding “Cyclops” has long emphasized the outward tension of Irish nationalism and the Orientalist tendencies of the Irish population, particularly in regards to Bloom’s Jewish lineage, but that academics have largely neglected to investigate deeper into “Joyce’s attitude toward either Arthur Griffith, the founder of Sinn Fein, or Michael Cusack, the main force behind the Gaelic Athletic Association” (245). Nielson’s analysis posits that a more nuanced understanding of the conflict between Irish nationalism and racialized others in “Cyclops” can be obtained if one is more aware of Joyce’s own political opinion and his relationship with Ireland’s national movement.

Despite Joyce’s self-imposed exile from Dublin, Nielson claims that the author still came into contact with Irish, anti-Jewish sentiment, through the disseminated political ideals of the prominent nationalist Arthur Griffith. Nielson offers many different examples of how the nationalism of Ireland influenced Joyce’s presentation of “Cyclops” and his characterization of Leopold Bloom. An especially glaring criticism of Bloom is uttered by the citizen who deems him “the bloody freemason” (U12.300). This easily looked over attack is actually an important historical allusion that ties “Cyclops” into the political reality of early 20th Century Irish nationalism, “Since he perceives Bloom unequivocally as a Jew, the insult obviously refers to the kind of Jewish world-conspiracy rhetoric which Griffith invoked in his newspaper” (251). Freemasonry was often equated with Judaism as an underlying sociopolitical force intent on eroding the Irish way of life.

Not only does Nielson’s writing astutely explain the origins of Bloom’s prejudiced characterization, it also offers commentary on the contemptible bigotry of Irish Republicanism, tracing the ideologies it stemmed from. Not only is “Cyclops” influenced by the popular nationalist ideals of the era, but also by older, similarly chauvinistic, Catholic scrutiny, “the clergy itself in Ireland also disseminated similar economic myths about British and Irish Jews” (Nielson 252). The nativistic and intolerant nationalism of Griffith, his peers, and the Irish-Catholic Church manifests in “Cyclops” through exclusionary barbs and aggression, “I’ll brain the bloody jewman” (U12.1811-1812). According to Nielson, the violent behavior of the citizen is a visible distillation of all these anti-foreign ideologies, “the character represents the inane convolutions of bigotry and desperate republicanism” (253).

 

Citations and Related Sources:

Cheyette, Bryan. “”‘Jewgreek Is Greekjew’: The Disturbing Ambivalence of Joyce’s Semitic Discourse in Ulysses.” Joyce Studies Annual 3 (1992): 43. JSTOR. Web. 5 Dec. 2016

 

Holmes, Colin. Anti-semitism in British Society, 1876-1939. Holmes & Meier, 1979. Print.

 

Larkin, Emmet J. The Consolidation of the Roman Catholic Church in Ireland, 1860-1870. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina, 1987. Print.

Hyperannotation 2

O’Day, Alan. The English Face of Irish Nationalism: Parnellite Involvement in British Politics 1880-86. Aldershot, Hampshire, England: Gregg Revivals, 1994. Print.

Related Topics:

Native and Foreign

Union and Division

Religion

 

Link to citation page: https://libweb.grinnell.edu/vufind/Record/.b1078472x

 

In The English Face of Irish Nationalism, Alan O’Day explicates on the history of Ireland’s national movement, particularly how it was shaped and given clout by an ascendant class of Anglo nobles. Starting with Gladstone’s liberal influence on the Irish question in the late 19th Century, O’Day analyzes the multiple prominent figures and governmental channels that most thoroughly developed strains of Irish nationalism. The paramount politico Parnell, a recognized Anglo-Irish leader, stands out as one of O’Day’s most crucial profiles.

During Ireland’s struggle for national autonomy, Parnell played an integral role in motivating the Irish people and diplomatically maneuvering against Britain. While The English Face of Irish Nationalism is concerned with the entirety of Irish nationalism in the years preceding the Irish Free State, O’Day closely inspects the political moves of Parnell, how is Anglo affiliation framed his form of Irish nationalism, and how he both aligned with and differed from fellow nationalists, most importantly the leftist and ethnically Irish factions of Ireland’s national movement.

 

Citations and Related Sources:

 

MacIntyre, Angus. “The Anglo-Irish and the New Ireland.” The English Historical Review, vol. 92, no. 365, 1977, pp. 866–868.

 

O’Brien, C. C. (1968). Parnell and His Party, 1880-90. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

 

Pelling, Henry. Social Geography of British Elections London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1967. Print.

 

 

 

Obsessions and Themes:

 

Religion

 

Ethnicity

 

Questions