{"id":602,"date":"2016-11-22T00:43:51","date_gmt":"2016-11-22T00:43:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/?p=602"},"modified":"2016-11-22T00:43:51","modified_gmt":"2016-11-22T00:43:51","slug":"first-annotation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/uncategorized\/first-annotation\/","title":{"rendered":"First Annotation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Baron, Scarlett. &#8220;Flaubert, Joyce: Vision, Photography, Cinema.&#8221;\u00a0<em>Modern Fiction Studies,\u00a0<\/em>vol. 54, no. 4, 2008, pp. 689-714,\u00a0https:\/\/muse.jhu.edu\/article\/257623\/pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.<\/p>\n<p>Noting the shortsightedness (so to speak) of previous analyses of Joyce&#8217;s work in comparison with cinema, Baron examines\u00a0<em>Ulysses\u00a0<\/em>as well as Joyce&#8217;s other texts through comparison with the work of Flaubert, noting a shared fixation on the technologies and techniques of vision that originates prior to the invention and popularization of film. Cautioning against a present-day tendency to assume the predominance of film as a technology of visualization, Baron begins by\u00a0looking towards &#8220;modernism&#8217;s literary heritage in the field of visual representation&#8221;(690) in order to more fully understand the significance of &#8220;cinematographic&#8221; narration in Joyce&#8217;s work.<\/p>\n<p>In the first of the article&#8217;s three sections, &#8220;Vision,&#8221; Baron begins by discussing the significance of vision in Flaubert&#8217;s writing. Using both Flaubert&#8217;s letters and quotes from his fiction, she identifies &#8220;an aspiration to observe surfaces intensely, so as to see what lies within: the essence of the object&#8221;(691). She then, meticulously citing various moments within\u00a0<em>Ulysses\u00a0<\/em>as well as\u00a0<em>Stephen Hero,\u00a0<\/em>argues that Joyce&#8217;s narratives contain a similar form of vision, &#8220;a vision that has taken as its object a specific, circumscribed object&#8221;(693). By locating the origins of this kind of myopic gaze in the earlier literature of Flaubert, Baron diverges from previous attempts to attribute this viewpoint to the &#8220;zoom-in&#8221; of film.<\/p>\n<p>Baron switches tactics for the article&#8217;s second section, &#8220;Photography,&#8221; in which she provides evidence not just for Flaubert and Joyce&#8217;s preoccupations with the developing technology of the photograph but for both authors&#8217; ultimate dismissal of its artistic merit. After citing Flaubert&#8217;s letters, in which he clearly articulates his contempt for the &#8220;mechanical process&#8221;(695) of the photograph compared to the vividness of the original, Baron points out that Joyce &#8211; whether or not he was aware of Flaubert&#8217;s views on photography &#8211; held a similar view that the photograph, however useful it might be, was &#8220;not a work of art&#8221;(695). Baron suggests that, for both of these authors (although especially Joyce), the issue in question was the\u00a0<em>stasis\u00a0<\/em>inherent in the photograph, using as evidence numerous moments in\u00a0<em>Ulysses\u00a0<\/em>in which the presence of photography seems to pause or interrupt the motion of a scene. References to the mutoscope &#8211; a kind of early motion picture device &#8211; as well as to screens in\u00a0<em>Ulysses\u00a0<\/em>function as a kind of history of the image that moves towards Baron&#8217;s final topic: cinema.<\/p>\n<p>In this last and longest section of the article, Baron argues that many of the narrative techniques popularized by Flaubert (such as the fade-to-black, or the misdirecting image cut), due to their focus on the visual, lent themselves naturally to the techniques of early cinema. Rather than just representing an investment of the narration\/camera in a focal character, however, Baron suggests this perspective can also create &#8220;estrangement of the narrator from his character&#8221;(704) important to both Flaubert and Joyce&#8217;s narrative styles. Therefore, Baron concludes that Joyce&#8217;s conscious and repeated use of cinematographic techniques in the narrative of\u00a0<em>Ulysses<\/em>\u00a0does not necessarily stem from the influence of cinema alone, but from a preoccupation with techniques of seeing &#8211; and with potential alienation from these techniques &#8211; that originates with his\u00a0<em>literary\u00a0<\/em>predecessors.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Baron, Scarlett. &#8220;Flaubert, Joyce: Vision, Photography, Cinema.&#8221;\u00a0Modern Fiction Studies,\u00a0vol. 54, no. 4, 2008, pp. 689-714,\u00a0https:\/\/muse.jhu.edu\/article\/257623\/pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2016. Noting the shortsightedness (so to speak) of previous analyses of Joyce&#8217;s work in comparison with cinema, Baron examines\u00a0Ulysses\u00a0as well as Joyce&#8217;s other texts through comparison with the work of Flaubert, noting a shared fixation on the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=602"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/602\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":604,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/602\/revisions\/604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}