{"id":102,"date":"2016-09-08T00:51:14","date_gmt":"2016-09-08T00:51:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/?p=102"},"modified":"2016-09-22T00:34:23","modified_gmt":"2016-09-22T00:34:23","slug":"continuity-and-change-in-ulysses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/uncategorized\/continuity-and-change-in-ulysses\/","title":{"rendered":"Continuity and Change in Ulysses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I found Mahaffey&#8217;s explanation of Gabler&#8217;s edition of <em>Ulysses<\/em> interesting in that her definition of editing, and what a good edition of a ([n] especially dated) text should do, seemed weirdly synonymous with the organic way she described Joyce&#8217;s process&#8211;&#8220;continu[ing] to write <em>Ulysses<\/em> in the margins of anywhere from two to nine sets of proof per episode, right up until two days before its ate of publication&#8221;( 241). This seemed to align really nicely with the editing process, which seemed equally organic in the way she describes Gabler&#8217;s attempt to &#8220;encourage a reader to move&#8230;forwards and backwards along the axis of diachrony of the work&#8217;s total text&#8221; in order to make it possible for us to &#8220;read backward as well as forward in narrative time&#8221; (241). If the job of the editor, as she says, is to make a dated piece accessible, she argues\u00a0that it&#8217;s necessary to make an edition that looks both forward and backwards. With this understanding of the edition we&#8217;ve been reading, I&#8217;m interested in seeing how the prose and content of the original version could be altered or even obscured by the &#8220;grime of history&#8221; editing seeks to clear away.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I found Mahaffey&#8217;s explanation of Gabler&#8217;s edition of Ulysses interesting in that her definition of editing, and what a good edition of a ([n] especially dated) text should do, seemed weirdly synonymous with the organic way she described Joyce&#8217;s process&#8211;&#8220;continu[ing] to write Ulysses in the margins of anywhere from two to nine sets of proof [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-102","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":103,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102\/revisions\/103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eriksimpson.sites.grinnell.edu\/Ulysses16\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}